İçeriğe geç
AC

Open Source Licenses: MIT, GPL, Apache

28 Nisan 2026 Artificial Intelligence and Web3 Law 1 dk okuma 43 görüntülenme

Although the use of open source software is common, licensing obligations are often overlooked.

Common Licenses

  • MIT: The most flexible, commercial use permission, attribution is sufficient
  • Apache 2.0: MIT-like + patent protection
  • GPL v3: "Copyleft" - derivative work is also open source mandatory
  • LGPL: Softened version of GPL (for library)
  • BSD: MIT-like
  • AGPL: SaaS version of GPL

GPL Copyleft

  • Any code combined with GPL code becomes GPL
  • Using GPL in commercial software → obligation to make all software open source
  • Administrators must be conscious

Consequences of Violation

  • Copyright infringement (FSEK)
  • Compensation (major lawsuits in the USA)
  • Closure request
  • Image damage

Turkish Law Applicability

  • License is a kind of contract (TBK)
  • Criminal liability for FSEK violation
  • The Supreme Court does not yet have extensive open source jurisprudence

What Companies Should Do

  • Follow all dependencies
  • Prepare SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
  • License scanning tools (FOSSology, Snyk)
  • See GPL separately from commercial software hold
  • Set licensing policy

AI and Open Source

  • If the AI model is open source, license is applied
  • Models such as Llama, Mistral are subject to special license
  • Training data copyright issue (separate discussion)

Software and intellectual property law lawyer recommended.

Telif bildirimi This content and all related Q&A texts are protected under Turkish Copyright Law No. 5846. Unauthorized copying, reproduction, publication, adaptation, bulk extraction, or commercial use is prohibited; legal and criminal remedies are reserved in case of infringement.

Hukuki destek arıyorsanız

Bu konuda profesyonel hukuki destek için Aycan Ceylan Avukatlık Bürosu olarak yanınızdayız.

Görüşme Planla