In compensation and receivables cases, the way of filing a lawsuit significantly affects the outcome. HMK art. 107-109 regulates partial and indefinite receivable cases.
Partial Lawsuit (HMK art. 109)
- A certain part of the receivable is claimed
- It can be increased later with an additional case
- Interest accrues from the date of filing of the partial case
- Trial fee is low is paid
Uncertain Receivable Case (HMK Art. 107)
- If the amount of the receivable is undetermined from the beginning
- "Minimum amount" is specified
- The exact amount is determined by the expert during the trial
- Interest is applied to the entire amount from the date of the case
Which is Preferred Should it be?
- If the amount of the receivable is known for sure: Full lawsuit (most advantageous for the beginning of interest)
- If the amount of the receivable is controversial/uncertain: Uncertain receivable (interest applies to the entire amount)
- If saving on the trial fee is desired: Partial lawsuit (but there is a loss of interest)
Supreme Court HGK Decision 2018/9-1
HGK emphasizes that it is possible to claim labor law receivables through an indefinite receivable lawsuit, but that a partial lawsuit is more appropriate for receivables that are recorded by the employer. compensationPartial lawsuit:Commercial receivables, consumer receivables